MOST OF THE WORLD’S GREAT SOULS have been lonely. Loneliness seems to be one price the saint must pay for his saintliness.
In the morning of the world (or should we say, in that strange darkness that came soon after the dawn of man’s creation) that pious soul, Enoch, walked with God and was not, for God took him; and while it is not stated in so many words, a fair inference is that Enoch walked a path quite apart from his contemporaries.
Another lonely man was Noah who, of all the antediluvians, found grace in the sight of God; and every shred of evidence points to the aloneness of his life even while surrounded by his people.
Again, Abraham had Sarah and Lot, as well as many servants and herdmen, but who can read his story and the apostolic comment upon it without sensing instantly that he was a man “whose soul was alike a star and dwelt apart”? As far as we know not one word did God ever speak to him in the company of men. Face down he communed with his God, and the innate dignity of the man forbade that he assume this posture in the presence of others. How sweet and solemn was the scene that night of the sacrifice when he saw the lamps of fire moving between the pieces of offering. There alone with a horror of great darkness upon him he heard the voice of God and knew that he was a man marked for divine favor.
Moses also was a man apart. While yet attached to the court of Pharaoh he took long walks alone, and during one of these walks while far removed from the crowds he saw an Egyptian and a Hebrew fighting and came to the rescue of his countryman. After the resultant break with Egypt he dwelt in almost complete seclusion in the desert. There while he watched his sheep alone the wonder of the burning bush appeared to him, and later on the peak of Sinai he crouched alone to gaze in fascinated awe at the Presence, partly hidden, partly disclosed, within the cloud and fire.
The prophets of pre-Christian times differed widely from each other, but one mark they bore in common was their enforced loneliness. They loved their people and gloried in the religion of the fathers, but their loyalty to the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and their zeal for the welfare of the nation of Israel drove them away from the crowd and into long periods of heaviness. “I am become a stranger unto my brethren, and an alien unto my mother’s children,” cried one and unwittingly spoke for all the rest.
Most revealing of all is the sight of that One of whom Moses and all the prophets did write treading His lonely way to the cross, His deep loneliness unrelieved by the presence of the multitudes.
‘Tis midnight, and on Olive’s brow
The star is dimmed that lately shone;
‘Tis midnight; in the garden now,
The suffering Saviour prays alone.
‘Tis midnight, and from all removed
The Saviour wrestles lone with fears,
E’en the disciple whom He loved
Heeds not his Master’s grief and tears.
-WILLIAM B. TAPPAN
He died alone in the darkness hidden from the sight of mortal man and no one saw Him when He arose triumphant and walked out of the tomb, though many saw Him afterward and bore witness to what they saw.
There are some things too sacred for any eye but God’s to look upon. The curiosity, the clamor, the well-meant but blundering effort to help can only hinder the waiting soul and make unlikely if not impossible the communication of the secret message of God to the worshiping heart.
Sometimes we react by a kind of religious reflex and repeat dutifully the proper words and phrases even though they fail to express our real feelings and lack the authenticity of personal experience. Right now is such a time. A certain conventional loyalty may lead some who hear this unfamiliar truth expressed for the first time to say brightly, “Oh, I am never lonely. Christ said, `I will never leave you nor forsake you,’ and, `Lo, I am with you alway.’ How can I be lonely when Jesus is with me?”
Now I do not want to reflect on the sincerity of any Christian soul, but this stock testimony is too neat to be real. It is obviously what the speaker thinks should be true rather than what he has proved to be true by the test of experience. This cheerful denial of loneliness proves only that the speaker has never walked with God without the support and encouragement afforded him by society. The sense of companionship which he mistakenly attributes to the presence of Christ may and probably does arise from the presence of friendly people. Always remember: you cannot carry a cross in company. Though a man were surrounded by a vast crowd, his cross is his alone and his carrying of it marks him as a man apart. Society has turned against him; otherwise he would have no cross. No one is a friend to the man with a cross. “They all forsook him, and fled.”
The pain of loneliness arises from the constitution of our nature. God made us for each other. The desire for human companionship is completely natural and right. The loneliness of the Christian results from his walk with God in an ungodly world, a walk that must often take him away from the fellowship of good Christians as well as from that of the unregenerate world. His Godgiven instincts cry out for companionship with others of his kind, others who can understand his longings, his aspirations, his absorption in the love of Christ; and because within his circle of friends there are so few who share his inner experiences he is forced to walk alone. The unsatisfied longings of the prophets for human understanding caused them to cry out in their complaint, and even our Lord Himself suffered in the same way.
The man who has passed on into the divine Presence in actual inner experience will not find many who understand him. A certain amount of social fellowship will of course be his as he mingles with religious persons in the regular activities of the church, but true spiritual fellowship will be hard to find. But he should not expect things to be otherwise. After all, he is a stranger and a pilgrim, and the journey he takes is not on his feet but in his heart. He walks with God in the garden of his own souland who but God can walk there with him? He is of another spirit from the multitudes that tread the courts of the Lord’s house. He has seen that of which they have only heard, and he walks among them somewhat as Zacharias walked after his return from the altar when the people whispered, “He has seen a vision.”
The truly spiritual man is indeed something of an oddity. He lives not for himself but to promote the interests of Another. He seeks to persuade people to give all to his Lord and asks no portion or share for himself. He delights not to be honored but to see his Saviour glorified in the eyes of men. His joy is to see his Lord promoted and himself neglected. He finds few who care to talk about that which is the supreme object of his interest, so he is often silent and preoccupied in the midst of noisy religious shoptalk. For this he earns the reputation of being dull and overserious, so he is avoided and the gulf between him and society widens. He searches for friends upon whose garments he can detect the smell of myrrh and aloes and cassia out of the ivory palaces, and finding few or none he, like Mary of old, keeps these things in his heart.
It is this very loneliness that throws him back upon God. “When my father and my mother forsake me, then the Lord will take me up.” His inability to find human companionship drives him to seek in God what he can find nowhere else. He learns in inner solitude what he could not have learned in the crowd that Christ is All in All, that He is made unto us wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption, that in Him we have and possess life’s summum bonum.
Two things remain to be said. One, that the lonely man of whom we speak is not a haughty man, nor is he the holier-than-thou, austere saint so bitterly satirized in popular literature. He is likely to feel that he is the least of all men and is sure to blame himself for his very loneliness. He wants to share his feelings with others and to open his heart to some like-minded soul who will understand him, but the spiritual climate around him does not encourage it, so he remains silent and tells his griefs to God alone.
The second thing is that the lonely saint is not the withdrawn man who hardens himself against human suffering and spends his days contemplating the heavens. Just the opposite is true. His loneliness makes him sympathetic to the approach of the broken-hearted and the fallen and the sin-bruised. Because he is detached from the world he is all the more able to help it. Meister Eckhart taught his followers that if they should find themselves in prayer as it were caught up to the third heavens and happen to remember that a poor widow needed food, they should break off the prayer instantly and go care for the widow. “God will not suffer you to lose anything by it,” he told them. “You can take up again in prayer where you left off and the Lord will make it up to you.” This is typical of the great mystics and masters of the interior life from Paul to the present day.
The weakness of so many modern Christians is that they feel too much at home in the world. In their effort to achieve restful “adjustment” to unregenerate society they have lost their pilgrim character and become an essential part of the very moral order against which they are sent to protest. The world recognizes them and accepts them for what they are. And this is the saddest thing that can be said about them. They are not lonely, but neither are they saints.
You may read the complete book here.
Articles placed or written on this blog are generally the position held by, and in agreement with, the blog administrators’ opinions. Further commentary by the administrators of this blog will therefore be limited. Public comments which do appear in response to the articles on this blog, are not necessarily representative of the opinion of the administrators of this blog or to be regarded as necessarily Biblically correct. Please read the “About Page” before commenting.
Very comforting indeed… there is nothing new under the sun, the loneliness of the Christian walk is certainly not a new phenomenon.
I have just found your web page. I have 1 question which will help me understand you better.
I used to be part of a group who referred to themselves as the ‘elect’. There are many other ‘groups’ who refer to themselves as the elect I have been badly scarred in my Christian walk(1967to the present).I have over the last 18+months re-visited my early convictions and found many to be wanting. Your site is the nearest thing to openness that I have found. I have a number of questions which I would like to address. The Spirit is my teacher(John 14:26+1 Cor. 2:9-16+1 John 2:27) I realize that no man can come to Jesus except the Father calls (John 6:40+44+65) I do believe that there are called out ones of whom Jesus is the first (Rom 8:29) I thing my difficulty lies in the Exclusive sound of the elect(Pharisees in Jesus time Main stream Christian and their hierarchy ,J.W’s
SDA’s. I believe that Jesus taught inclusiveness not exclusiveness. If I read the above scriptures correctly God the Father does the calling, Jesus brings those who ‘hear’ to us to guide, not on our strength but with the indwelling Spirit that we are given at repentance and the laying on of hands.
I welcome a response, I feel very isolated as my thinking does not seem to fit into the current ‘Christian’ trends. This question is the first of many that I would welcome open direction on.
I live on Vancouver Island in British Columbia Canada. I have tried many groups who seem to shun sharing the word.
(I have also posted this comment in response to your comment under thread on my article “Mandela and Voortrekker monuments: Idols of my beloved people”. If you wish to respond further, please comment on that thread. Many thanks.)
Thank you for commenting again. Your comment certainly contains many aspects and many questions. I am not quite sure I understand all your questions clearly. To address them all sufficiently, would require more than a simple reply here. In most instances, our attempting to summarize answers to more complex questions in hasty words, does not do the truth of the Gospel, or even the question, any justice.
My apologies for the slight delay in my response, I have been dealing with a few very pressing issues of late. In general, I do not have much time to devote to the virtual world on the internet. I will address some of your statements / questions very briefly.
If you were once part of a group who were truly God’s elect, you are still a part of that same group today. We cannot move in and out of being a part of God’s elect. God does not save a person for a while and then forsake them at another stage. Christ was crucified once for our sins, we cannot re-crucify Christ to pay for our sins again and again. See verses such as 1 John 2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. But they went out, that it might become plain that they all are not of us.
There are certainly many who refer to themselves as the ‘elect’, who are quite obviously not God’s people. Among those are the groups you refer to such as the Pharisees in Jesus’ time, will-worshippers, J.W’s and SDA’s, among many others. There are many who are self-appointed and self-righteous Christians, who are believers only by name, but not by the Spirit of God. Of course, this does not mean that God cannot or will not save a member of any of those groups, according to His Sovereign will.
God has predestinated or predetermined in his eternal purpose that all whom He saves shall one day be just like his Son, Jesus Christ , that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Under the Old Testament law, the firstborn was the Lord’s choice, who had authority over all the sons, and acted as the Lord’s priest. Christ is the firstborn of the Father with regard to all creatures. Christ is the firstborn of all God’s sons. All of God’s people are they are chosen in Jesus Christ. Christ is the firstborn from the dead to die no more.
I’m not quite sure what you mean here. If you are referring to universal atonement, general atonement or common grace, then that inclusiveness is not Biblical. In brief, the following applies:
Jesus Christ died to pay for all the sins of those whom He called to believe in Him. All people who are enabled by the Holy Spirit to truly believe in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour, who acknowledge that He is the Son of God, are included among the saved.
All people who are not enabled by the Holy Spirit, who deny that Jesus Christ is Lord, Saviour and the Son of God, are excluded from those who will be saved.
To believe that all people will be saved and that Jesus Christ died to save all men, is to say that those who are in Hell, those who deserve Hell through their unbelief, those who deny His Lordship and those who oppose God, will also be saved.
If all men will be saved, then all men might as well sin freely and without fear of consequence. To believe that all men will be saved, is to deny the truth that God hates sin. If all men are equally beloved of God, what do we do with Romans 9:13 which states clearly that God loved Jacob, but hated Esau?
I am glad you termed it as “Christian” trends, in inverted commas. I am also glad you distinguish the trends as current, as these popular and deceitful trends do tend to change continually, as the false churches and preachers need to keep their audiences interested by providing them with fresh and exciting promises and lies. True Christianity is eternal, timeless, unchanging. There is nothing new under the sun. Test everything by the Word, compare the words of every man to what the Bible tells us. Also test everything I say, by checking it against the Word of God.
The true Gospel has never been popular. True Christians have always been, and will always be an isolated group. If it is, that by the Grace of God you are part of that isolated group, you are in the best place you could ever possibly be.
We are not called to seek out any group. Christians are called to faith in Jesus Christ and are, by the grace of God, all placed into the universal church in Jesus Christ. Any group who shuns sharing the Word, is by its nature, not Christian. To the unbeliever the Word of God is foolishness. To the believer, the Word of God is eternal truth, nourishment and comfort.
It is wonderful to hear from Vancouver Island.
Grace to you.